"Does Copyright protection for AI work? Analysing the discrepancy between Europe and the United States by examining the reality and mystery in both continents"

Copyright and its correlation with Artificial Intelligence has given jurists a hard time around the world. The progressive advancement of this technology in the various work and artistic fields means that the legal framework in which it falls changes its initial structure. The result is a deformed figure that takes opposite directions, depending on the relevant laws of the state in question. Technology has always been a means to achieve human progress. The consequence lies in the "forced" advancement of the rest of the sectors of man's daily life. For example, in the health sector it was necessary to take into account that, over time, new technologies, new machines would have taken hold in hospitals and doctors, biotechnologists and chemists had to "run" to catch up with the support "advanced". The same also in the legal sector, as analyzing a lawsuit that has a robot, a machine, an Artificial Intelligence at the center of attention is really challenging. It is a continuous updating not so much on the new laws enacted and entered into force but on how much and how the technology is progressing, so as to always have an idea of what to expect and how to manage a possible dispute in the courtroom. The paper focuses on the gap between the United States and Europe and it will be agreed that if the two, although there are numerous points in common, the final response is similar but with a subtle difference in the thinking behind the decision to give or not the right to copyright to a 'work entirely written by Artificial Intelligence. "Does Copyright protection for AI work?", this is the question I will try to answer, but the real question to ask is "Are man and machines to be considered on the same level?". This is a great unknown.