How the linguistic approach on queer and gendered themes in TV series has changed: a focus on Grey's Anatomy

This thesis investigates whether the narrative surrounding queer and gendered topics in the TV series Grey’s Anatomy has changed over time, and if so, in which ways. To answer the research question, an analysis of linguistic and narrative changes is employed, focusing on women's empowerment, reproductive rights, and LGBTQIA+ representation, with particular attention to narrative tropes and persuasive language. The thesis aims to examine how these elements have evolved, offering a sociological perspective and proposing insights based on Critical Discourse Analysis, gender and feminist theories, while highlighting references to the contemporary sociopolitical context in the United States. Chapter 1 provides a comprehensive overview of Grey’s Anatomy, analyzing audience engagement and viewing trends, as well as significant themes and the show's target audience. Chapter 2 explores in depth the role of female characters in relation to their male counterparts, focusing on the portrayal of Meredith Grey in the early seasons and the implications of Derek Shepherd’s death. This analysis reveals how the dynamics within a hospital predominantly run by women challenge traditional gender roles and power structures. Chapter 3 addresses abortion and reproductive rights by analyzing Cristina Yang’s choice within the narrative, and how the recent overturning of Roe v. Wade shaped the narrative of season nineteen. Chapter 4 explores LGBTQIA+ representation and family dynamics, tracing the evolution of LGBTQIA+ characters throughout the series and examining the depiction of LGBTQIA+ families. The research aims at showing a significant evolution in queer and gendered themes over the seasons, marked by increased representation, character development, and engagement with contemporary political issues, while also addressing negative aspects and consequences.