The present work reconstructs a Peripatetic theory of intellect developed in the post-Hellenistic period, as reported by Alexander of Aphrodisias in his De Intellectu. Moreover, this inquiry aims at a threefold goal: to demonstrate that these thinkers were proper exegetes of Aristotle’s works, and especially his De Anima; to prove that, despite the exegetical value of this operation, the philosophical worth of the Peripatetic theory itself is not jeopardized; and to show that this theory was crucial for both contemporary and later philosophers, and especially for the development of Alexander’s own theory of intellect (and, hence, of god). In so doing, the Peripatetic theory of the ‘intellect from without’ will emerge, revealing its efficient and effective nature, and its fundamental overlap with the Aristotelian ‘agent intellect’ of De Anima 3.5. A quite complex framework will come up eventually, a framework whose scope is not merely a psychological one, but rather addresses ontological, epistemological, and cosmological issues as well.
The present work reconstructs a Peripatetic theory of intellect developed in the post-Hellenistic period, as reported by Alexander of Aphrodisias in his De Intellectu. Moreover, this inquiry aims at a threefold goal: to demonstrate that these thinkers were proper exegetes of Aristotle’s works, and especially his De Anima; to prove that, despite the exegetical value of this operation, the philosophical worth of the Peripatetic theory itself is not jeopardized; and to show that this theory was crucial for both contemporary and later philosophers, and especially for the development of Alexander’s own theory of intellect (and, hence, of god). In so doing, the Peripatetic theory of the ‘intellect from without’ will emerge, revealing its efficient and effective nature, and its fundamental overlap with the Aristotelian ‘agent intellect’ of De Anima 3.5. A quite complex framework will come up eventually, a framework whose scope is not merely a psychological one, but rather addresses ontological, epistemological, and cosmological issues as well.
Il problema dell'intelletto nel Peripato pre-alessandrista: la riscoperta di un modello teorico
FAZIO, LUDOVICA MARIA
2023/2024
Abstract
The present work reconstructs a Peripatetic theory of intellect developed in the post-Hellenistic period, as reported by Alexander of Aphrodisias in his De Intellectu. Moreover, this inquiry aims at a threefold goal: to demonstrate that these thinkers were proper exegetes of Aristotle’s works, and especially his De Anima; to prove that, despite the exegetical value of this operation, the philosophical worth of the Peripatetic theory itself is not jeopardized; and to show that this theory was crucial for both contemporary and later philosophers, and especially for the development of Alexander’s own theory of intellect (and, hence, of god). In so doing, the Peripatetic theory of the ‘intellect from without’ will emerge, revealing its efficient and effective nature, and its fundamental overlap with the Aristotelian ‘agent intellect’ of De Anima 3.5. A quite complex framework will come up eventually, a framework whose scope is not merely a psychological one, but rather addresses ontological, epistemological, and cosmological issues as well.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Fazio_Il problema dell'intelletto nel Peripato pre-alessandrista.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
1.43 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.43 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14240/6421