In 1989, Van den Dries showed that definable sets, in henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, admit a particularly nice description, that somehow resembles the one available for definable sets in algebraically closed fields. A result like this one begs the question -- can something similar be said about other classes of fields? Can one find a unifying framework encompassing all fields (possibly with some further hypotheses) whose definable sets can be decomposed this way? The first step is, necessarily, finding an adequate notion of "open" -- such a notion should, then, survive a reality check: it should coincide with available, classical notions of openness, like Zariski open or valuation open, in all natural cases. In come étale methods. Or more specifically, the étale-open topology, which is a candidate for the notion of "openness" that was needed. One might think of it as a way of assigning, uniformly, a topology to all k-varieties over a certain field k; and indeed, it is the data of a covariant functor that carries over geometrical (and algebraic) information from the k-varieties to certain topological spaces obtained from their k-points. The étale-open topology is two-faced -- on the one hand, it$ acts as a dictionary between algebraic properties of k and topological properties. As an example, the field k is not separably closed if and only if this topology is Hausdorff on every quasi-projective k-variety. On the other, it generalizes several well-known topologies: if k is separably closed, for example, it is just the Zariski topology; if k is real closed, it is the order topology; if it is henselian, it is the valuation topology. Bothof these faces come into play when the étale-open topology is applied to obtain results on the algebraic properties of certain model-theoretically interesting fields. In chapter 3 and 4, two of these kind of applications are explored -- under the assumption of largeness, without which the étale-open topology is just the discrete topology: a specific instance of the Stable Fields Conjecture is proved, namely that stable large fields are separably closed; and on a similar vein, in the following chapter, simple large fields are shown to be bounded. Finally, chapter 5 goes back to the beginning of our story. Now that we have a notion of "openness" at hand, we can isolate the class of fields where definable sets admit a nice topological decomposition, namely éz fields. In particular, two examples of éz fields are explored in detail: henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, and algebraically maximal Kaplansky valued fields. All of the work is based on papers by Johnson, Tran, Walsberg and Ye.

In 1989, Van den Dries showed that definable sets, in henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, admit a particularly nice description, that somehow resembles the one available for definable sets in algebraically closed fields. A result like this one begs the question -- can something similar be said about other classes of fields? Can one find a unifying framework encompassing all fields (possibly with some further hypotheses) whose definable sets can be decomposed this way? The first step is, necessarily, finding an adequate notion of "open" -- such a notion should, then, survive a reality check: it should coincide with available, classical notions of openness, like Zariski open or valuation open, in all natural cases. In come étale methods. Or more specifically, the étale-open topology, which is a candidate for the notion of "openness" that was needed. One might think of it as a way of assigning, uniformly, a topology to all k-varieties over a certain field k; and indeed, it is the data of a covariant functor that carries over geometrical (and algebraic) information from the k-varieties to certain topological spaces obtained from their k-points. The étale-open topology is two-faced -- on the one hand, it$ acts as a dictionary between algebraic properties of k and topological properties. As an example, the field k is not separably closed if and only if this topology is Hausdorff on every quasi-projective k-variety. On the other, it generalizes several well-known topologies: if k is separably closed, for example, it is just the Zariski topology; if k is real closed, it is the order topology; if it is henselian, it is the valuation topology. Bothof these faces come into play when the étale-open topology is applied to obtain results on the algebraic properties of certain model-theoretically interesting fields. In chapter 3 and 4, two of these kind of applications are explored -- under the assumption of largeness, without which the étale-open topology is just the discrete topology: a specific instance of the Stable Fields Conjecture is proved, namely that stable large fields are separably closed; and on a similar vein, in the following chapter, simple large fields are shown to be bounded. Finally, chapter 5 goes back to the beginning of our story. Now that we have a notion of "openness" at hand, we can isolate the class of fields where definable sets admit a nice topological decomposition, namely éz fields. In particular, two examples of éz fields are explored in detail: henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, and algebraically maximal Kaplansky valued fields. All of the work is based on papers by Johnson, Tran, Walsberg and Ye.

Étale methods in model theory

RAMELLO, SIMONE
2020/2021

Abstract

In 1989, Van den Dries showed that definable sets, in henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, admit a particularly nice description, that somehow resembles the one available for definable sets in algebraically closed fields. A result like this one begs the question -- can something similar be said about other classes of fields? Can one find a unifying framework encompassing all fields (possibly with some further hypotheses) whose definable sets can be decomposed this way? The first step is, necessarily, finding an adequate notion of "open" -- such a notion should, then, survive a reality check: it should coincide with available, classical notions of openness, like Zariski open or valuation open, in all natural cases. In come étale methods. Or more specifically, the étale-open topology, which is a candidate for the notion of "openness" that was needed. One might think of it as a way of assigning, uniformly, a topology to all k-varieties over a certain field k; and indeed, it is the data of a covariant functor that carries over geometrical (and algebraic) information from the k-varieties to certain topological spaces obtained from their k-points. The étale-open topology is two-faced -- on the one hand, it$ acts as a dictionary between algebraic properties of k and topological properties. As an example, the field k is not separably closed if and only if this topology is Hausdorff on every quasi-projective k-variety. On the other, it generalizes several well-known topologies: if k is separably closed, for example, it is just the Zariski topology; if k is real closed, it is the order topology; if it is henselian, it is the valuation topology. Bothof these faces come into play when the étale-open topology is applied to obtain results on the algebraic properties of certain model-theoretically interesting fields. In chapter 3 and 4, two of these kind of applications are explored -- under the assumption of largeness, without which the étale-open topology is just the discrete topology: a specific instance of the Stable Fields Conjecture is proved, namely that stable large fields are separably closed; and on a similar vein, in the following chapter, simple large fields are shown to be bounded. Finally, chapter 5 goes back to the beginning of our story. Now that we have a notion of "openness" at hand, we can isolate the class of fields where definable sets admit a nice topological decomposition, namely éz fields. In particular, two examples of éz fields are explored in detail: henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, and algebraically maximal Kaplansky valued fields. All of the work is based on papers by Johnson, Tran, Walsberg and Ye.
ENG
In 1989, Van den Dries showed that definable sets, in henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, admit a particularly nice description, that somehow resembles the one available for definable sets in algebraically closed fields. A result like this one begs the question -- can something similar be said about other classes of fields? Can one find a unifying framework encompassing all fields (possibly with some further hypotheses) whose definable sets can be decomposed this way? The first step is, necessarily, finding an adequate notion of "open" -- such a notion should, then, survive a reality check: it should coincide with available, classical notions of openness, like Zariski open or valuation open, in all natural cases. In come étale methods. Or more specifically, the étale-open topology, which is a candidate for the notion of "openness" that was needed. One might think of it as a way of assigning, uniformly, a topology to all k-varieties over a certain field k; and indeed, it is the data of a covariant functor that carries over geometrical (and algebraic) information from the k-varieties to certain topological spaces obtained from their k-points. The étale-open topology is two-faced -- on the one hand, it$ acts as a dictionary between algebraic properties of k and topological properties. As an example, the field k is not separably closed if and only if this topology is Hausdorff on every quasi-projective k-variety. On the other, it generalizes several well-known topologies: if k is separably closed, for example, it is just the Zariski topology; if k is real closed, it is the order topology; if it is henselian, it is the valuation topology. Bothof these faces come into play when the étale-open topology is applied to obtain results on the algebraic properties of certain model-theoretically interesting fields. In chapter 3 and 4, two of these kind of applications are explored -- under the assumption of largeness, without which the étale-open topology is just the discrete topology: a specific instance of the Stable Fields Conjecture is proved, namely that stable large fields are separably closed; and on a similar vein, in the following chapter, simple large fields are shown to be bounded. Finally, chapter 5 goes back to the beginning of our story. Now that we have a notion of "openness" at hand, we can isolate the class of fields where definable sets admit a nice topological decomposition, namely éz fields. In particular, two examples of éz fields are explored in detail: henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, and algebraically maximal Kaplansky valued fields. All of the work is based on papers by Johnson, Tran, Walsberg and Ye.
IMPORT DA TESIONLINE
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
839806_master_thesis.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Dimensione 754.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
754.03 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14240/44405