The GameStop short squeeze of January 2021 was a pivotal event in financial markets, highlighting the growing influence of retail investors, social media, and digital trading platforms. This thesis examines the phenomenon, focusing on its causes, key players, market dynamics, and regulatory implications. Retail investors, primarily coordinated through Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets, collectively bought shares of GameStop Corp. (GME), triggering a short squeeze that sent the stock soaring from $17.25 to $483. Hedge funds with large short positions suffered massive losses, challenging traditional market power dynamics. Social media played a crucial role, rapidly spreading information and fueling a self-reinforcing buying cycle. Herd mentality and fear of missing out (FOMO) contributed to extreme volatility. Trading platforms like Robinhood, which restricted trading at the peak, faced criticism for alleged market manipulation, intensifying debates on investor protection. Regulatory responses included SEC proposals to enhance short-selling transparency, regulate trading platform gamification, and address conflicts of interest in payment for order flow (PFOF). The case underscores the tension between financial democratization and market stability. The GameStop saga exemplifies a broader shift in financial markets, where decentralized retail trading can disrupt institutional strategies. While regulatory reforms aim to address systemic risks, balancing market integrity with investor accessibility remains a key challenge in the evolving digital investment landscape.
The GameStop short squeeze of January 2021 was a pivotal event in financial markets, highlighting the growing influence of retail investors, social media, and digital trading platforms. This thesis examines the phenomenon, focusing on its causes, key players, market dynamics, and regulatory implications. Retail investors, primarily coordinated through Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets, collectively bought shares of GameStop Corp. (GME), triggering a short squeeze that sent the stock soaring from $17.25 to $483. Hedge funds with large short positions suffered massive losses, challenging traditional market power dynamics. Social media played a crucial role, rapidly spreading information and fueling a self-reinforcing buying cycle. Herd mentality and fear of missing out (FOMO) contributed to extreme volatility. Trading platforms like Robinhood, which restricted trading at the peak, faced criticism for alleged market manipulation, intensifying debates on investor protection. Regulatory responses included SEC proposals to enhance short-selling transparency, regulate trading platform gamification, and address conflicts of interest in payment for order flow (PFOF). The case underscores the tension between financial democratization and market stability. The GameStop saga exemplifies a broader shift in financial markets, where decentralized retail trading can disrupt institutional strategies. While regulatory reforms aim to address systemic risks, balancing market integrity with investor accessibility remains a key challenge in the evolving digital investment landscape.
The GameStop case: the dynamics behind it and its consequences
RINALDO, EDOARDO
2024/2025
Abstract
The GameStop short squeeze of January 2021 was a pivotal event in financial markets, highlighting the growing influence of retail investors, social media, and digital trading platforms. This thesis examines the phenomenon, focusing on its causes, key players, market dynamics, and regulatory implications. Retail investors, primarily coordinated through Reddit’s r/WallStreetBets, collectively bought shares of GameStop Corp. (GME), triggering a short squeeze that sent the stock soaring from $17.25 to $483. Hedge funds with large short positions suffered massive losses, challenging traditional market power dynamics. Social media played a crucial role, rapidly spreading information and fueling a self-reinforcing buying cycle. Herd mentality and fear of missing out (FOMO) contributed to extreme volatility. Trading platforms like Robinhood, which restricted trading at the peak, faced criticism for alleged market manipulation, intensifying debates on investor protection. Regulatory responses included SEC proposals to enhance short-selling transparency, regulate trading platform gamification, and address conflicts of interest in payment for order flow (PFOF). The case underscores the tension between financial democratization and market stability. The GameStop saga exemplifies a broader shift in financial markets, where decentralized retail trading can disrupt institutional strategies. While regulatory reforms aim to address systemic risks, balancing market integrity with investor accessibility remains a key challenge in the evolving digital investment landscape.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tesi.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
1.61 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in UNITESI sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14240/167146